‘Leadership’ has steadily spread through the corporate world, business schools, and executive education, in various forms and reinventions, such as ‘Leadership for Performance’, ‘Sustainable Leadership’, ‘Strategic Leadership’, ‘Leadership for Change’, ‘Agile Leadership’, ‘Leadership and Decision-making’, ‘Effective Leadership’ or ‘Authentic Leadership’ to name just a few. Furthermore, essential issues mirroring society have been added in recent years, starting with CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility), now DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion), or Corporate Environmental Responsibility (CER), all extremely relevant for organizations as they attempt to define their ‘Mission Statements’ and ‘Company Values’. At this stage of my life, I have seen many such statements and am yet to see much difference among them, ranging from ‘customer centric’, to ‘integrity’, ‘trust’, ‘respect’, ‘innovation’, ‘teamwork’, and of course ‘our employees are our most valuable asset’. Attempting to address these important aspects is very commendable, but are they really ‘lived’ or just ‘stated’? It leaves me with the image of an overloaded ship, becoming rudderless and sinking, like the Titanic.
These thoughts were somewhat triggered by a recent event. I was recently attending a Harvard Medical School (HMS) Colloquium organized by Mass General Hospital (MGH) on Cancer Equity. Community Outreach and Engagement (COE) was one of the main subjects, leading a very engaged speaker to say: “COE is not a checkbox!”. This immediately raised the question in my mind as to whether these statements, values and other commitments made by organizations may not just be ‘checkboxes’, satisfying the annual report requirements, or looking good on a website, but are they enough to make them ‘preferred employers’ or ‘preferred suppliers’? Where do we draw the line between a ‘marketing tagline’ and ‘genuine responsibility’? In other words, who do you fool? At this same Cancer Equity event, a very passionate nurse, also the founder of an association supporting cancer patients in disadvantaged neighborhoods, gave the answer: “People read people”.
What then will prevent this ‘Titanic’ from hitting the next iceberg? When I feel overwhelmed, I tend to return to the past. In a 1961 article titled ‘Understanding Leadership’ (Harvard Business Review September/October 1961 and again published in HBR in January 2004)), W. C. H. Prentice defined leadership as “the accomplishment of a goal through the direction of human assistants”. He would see a leader’s unique achievement as a “human and social one which stems from his understanding of his fellow workers”. He thought that “an ideal organization should have workers at every level reporting to someone whose dominion is small enough to enable him to know as human beings those who report to him”. In reflecting the vertical and structured organization prevailing at the time, his thoughts may now appear outdated, but his rejection of the “notion of leadership as the exercise of power and force” and the introduction of the “human and social” element provided a new foundation to ‘leadership’.
The more fundamental change came later under the influence of two Harvard Business School scholars. Abraham Zaleznik and Harry Levinson moved the focus from ‘process’ to ‘substance’ by applying organizational psychodynamics to leaders and leadership. They were joined by Manfred Kets de Vries, who became a ‘pioneer’ in leadership education showing vision and courage when creating his flagship ‘Challenge of Leadership’ (COL) program at INSEAD in 1991, which he still runs more than thirty years later. Far from the current ‘puzzle of words and concepts’, Manfred Kets de Vries’s ongoing life commitment is ‘simply’ to “make better leaders” by first allowing them to connect or reconnect with themselves and become better human beings. He wanted these leaders to “stop being strangers to themselves”.
I had the privilege of attending the first Consulting and Coaching for Change (CCC) Master program designed by Manfred Kets de Vries in 2001/2002, in some way, an extension of his COL program, enabling some of us to contribute to “making better leaders”. This was not a ‘teaching’ program but a ‘learning’ program. It connected me to a definition of leadership I embraced from Henry Kissinger, former U. S. Secretary of State: “Taking people from where they are to where they have not been”. At the end of this program, Manfred Kets de Vries, allowed me and others to “do something we did not know we were capable of doing”. Ultimately, he embodied a fundamental aspect of leadership, as a ‘mentor’ more than a ‘teacher’, enabling a former senior executive like me to move “from the boardroom to the classroom” (Kets de Vries, M. - 2007, Coach and Couch), and set my path on a road of discovery, starting with self-discovery. None of the programs listed at the beginning of this paper would ever achieve such transformation, and, for that matter, none will ever reach the longevity achieved by COL or CCC over several decades. In this case, inspiration and substance are ‘real life’ experiences, not ‘buzz words’.
This approach defines leadership with quite a distance from Prentice’s “human assistants” by bringing the ‘leader’ in the forefront as a ‘human being’ and a ‘merchant of hope’. This ‘return to the past’ turns out to be a helpful “back to the future”. What then makes Kets de Vries’s approach different? Part of the answer is that he sees the world of leadership at the interface of international management, cognitive theory, psychoanalysis, psychotherapy, evolutionary psychology, anthropology, and executive coaching, not to mention his initial studies in Economics. Blending a variety of ‘images’ brings different perspectives, out of reach when simply adding ‘words and concepts’.
Having devoted the past twenty years to executive education, consulting and coaching, learning remains my ‘lifeline’. Following these years surrounded by psychoanalysts, I became interested in getting a psychoanalytic ‘lens’ and joined a Master’s Program in Psychoanalysis, Society, and Culture at the Boston Graduate School of Psychoanalysis (BGSP). The school’s ambition is to develop ‘well-trained mental health practitioners’ and provide ‘a deep understanding of human nature’. I was particularly attracted by that second aspect and realized that a life experience is really down to very few elements: the memory of holding my grandfather’s hand as a young child, the good fortune of coming across a few generous mentors, a loving family and meaningful relationships across many different cultures. This may be the closest one can get to ‘happiness’ as defined by Kant: “Something to do, someone to love, and something to look forward to”, grandchildren being the best representation of hope. At this stage of my life, I am not defined by ‘what I did’, but ‘who I am’, in line with Irvin Yalom’s quote: “Become who you are" (Yalom, I. – 1992 – When Nietzsche Wept).
I also realize that I may be more of a ‘leader’ now than I ever was as an Executive Board member. Yet, I no longer have anyone reporting to me. As a volunteer in an outpatient cancer center or, recently, a ‘citizen-scientist’, working with clinicians, researchers, patients, and communities on psychosocial cancer research with the objective to reduce disparities in access to cancer care, I am an ‘outsider’ but probably closer than ever to finding a meaningful role. My role, is mostly to listen, exchange, and, precisely, provide an ‘outside’ perspective. I have the privilege of interacting in a hospital environment with wonderful human beings, as again demonstrated in my recent experience attending the HMS Cancer Equity event. Every day, they ‘lead’ in an inspiring way, with empathy, respect, and humanity. ‘Presence’ may identify each and every one of them more than the ‘standardized’ word of ‘leadership’.
‘Leadership’ as defined may find its place within the limited boundaries of large corporate organizations, while ‘Presence’ is thriving everywhere else if one takes the time to look. This notion of ‘presence’ reminded me of the early period of the Covid pandemic in 2020, as New York was overwhelmed by infections, hospitalizations, and deaths. At the time, ‘healthcare workers’ and ‘essential workers’ were celebrated every night at 7:00 PM as ‘heroes’, which they were. Two years later in 2022, celebrations are gone and the ‘heroes’ have gone back to ‘invisibility’, even though they are as or more ‘present’ and ‘essential’. ‘New voices’ in leadership should have the ‘disruptive presence’ of celebrating people when they are invisible, not just when they are visible.
As a reflection of society, organizations are multiple in size, scope, range, purpose, for profit or non-for profit and work itself is more diverse than ever before. It may be time for the business world to take notice and leave the rough waters of the Titanic for the smooth sailing of ‘Presence’.
Jean Claude Noel is Senior Associate at KDVI and Citizen-Scientist at Mount Sinai Hospital Tisch Cancer Institute in New York.
KDVI, 2022Read more
A volunteer’s identity is just based on ‘who you are’ and not ‘what you do’ or ‘what you represent’ through status, title or other attributes. This is both rewarding and humbling.
Published on 12 Mar, 2020
Beware of the cultish techniques that have crossed into the workplace
Why would anyone be attracted to a cult? Many businesses have cult-like characteristics which, on one hand, can provide structure and order, on the other, they can breed paranoia and stifle creative thinking.
Published on 2 Nov, 2018
"Assessing psychological risk factors of leaders"
This blog presents a quick assessment of psychological risk factors for high performing individuals.
Published on 18 Apr, 2015
The spontaneous eruption of musical offerings in the shadow of the Covid-19 crisis is a phenomenon that we have all witnessed and are aware of. But what if anything, do these musical offerings invoke and what in general does music offer us? This blog explores how music can add an element of playfulness to a reflective journey that can deepen ones understanding of self and how you are perceived by others.
Published on 14 May, 2020
"Down the rabbit hole of shame"
Shame is part of the human experience. Keeping your feelings of shame in perspective can relieve you of a harmful tendency to self-blame, and, eventually, make peace with your shadow side. Knowing that you are good enough, worthwhile, and deserving of love and acceptance is essential for building resilience and living your most authentic life.
Published on 1 Jun, 2017
"Corporate genius and psychopaths"
This blog entry with the Harvard Business Review. discusses the thin line between corporate genius and psychopaths.
Published on 7 Jan, 2014
'Words can give, at times, the illusion of providing a clear meaning'
The KDVI Research Lab is happy to announce another blog in our series that explores the undercurrents of positive organisational change. This time KDVI Associate Christopher Bockmann explores how the gap between what is intended, expressed and understood can be reduced.
Published on 15 Jan, 2018
“Knowing is the easy part; saying it out loud is the hard part.”
Successful coaching involves working with – not against – an individual’s resistance.
Published on 20 Aug, 2018
“Think narcissist, think female!”
"Think narcissist, think male"? A further addition to our narcissism blog series, this blog shows that women leaders, too, can be narcissistic. Yet it's a different kind of narcissism with different implications for leadership development. Three types of narcissistic women leaders - the Super Woman, the Perfectionist and the Lenient Leader - are examined.
Published on 23 Jul, 2018
Take a look at your strengths and development areas through the eyes of others.
Many of today’s leaders lack self-knowledge. They are not very reflective of their actions; they may even suffer from hubris, lacking a sense of humility that allows them to clearly see where their weaknesses lie. Asking others what they think of our actions is not the best way of finding out. People are not always straight-forward and executives may be reluctant to be seen “seeking approval”. The INSEAD Global Leadership Centre has taken the findings of its leadership development work (gleaned over 10 years of leadership coaching), to develop the Global Executive Leadership Mirror (“The Global Mirror”), providing a lens through which executives can take a closer, 360 degree look at their own personal leadership behavior.
Published on 23 Oct, 2014