Around the world, plans are being launched to work with an app to fight COVID-19. It makes sense: the virus can be contained more easily and countries can be released from their lockdowns sooner. Experiences in China are promising. However, while some are enthusiastic, others are worried about their privacy.
Impressive change management and leadership will be necessary to convince people to adjust their behaviour, to eventually conquer the virus and revive the economy.
Change management has been applied in companies and organisations for years and business schools have long taught on the subject. Heifetz, senior lecturer in public leadership at Harvard, speaks about the difference between technical and adaptive change. When the problem and the solution are clear, and there is an authority that decides, it is a technical change. A good example is a bacterial infection - through blood work, the type of bacteria can be determined andthe doctor can prescribe the right antibiotics.
When dealing with adaptive change, the problem and the solution are less clear. Continuous cycles of experimenting and learning are necessary to find the right solution. With Covid-19, many stakeholders with different views are involved: optimizing IC capacity, stimulating solidarity amongst people, protecting the weak in society, maintaining employment as much as possible. The list is endless, and the solution is not simple. How to control the virus, without letting the economy collapse? It is clear that fighting Covid-19 is a major adaptive challenge.
In leadership, it is important to communicate the direction clearly, and to motivate and inspire people to follow the vision. It is interesting to watch leaders in different countries following different approaches. Boris Johnson (UK) focused mostly on the new rules with an emphasis on enforcement measures. Jacinda Ardern (New Zealand) showed a lot of empathy with the effects on people’s lives and focused on the meaning and purpose (saving lives), rather than on the measures. She also took a lot of time for questions.
The next phase of this crisis is to allow the economy to recover. The 1.5 or 2-meter society is speculated on, as well as the introduction of (mandatory) apps. There is less attention given to the feelings of people about the app, or how to motivate people to use it. Do politicians think that rational arguments will convince people?
It is important to understand the deeper motivations for change. Often, the problem is not the change itself, but what people are losing. Everyone wants to fight Covid-19 and revive the economy, but are they willing to make the sacrifices? There is no ‘one size fits all’. Where some people are persuaded by arguments, others want to see positive results first and others are waiting to see what their family and friends decide.
What adaptive leadership is needed to get the desired change in behaviour?
Margot Schumacher MBA, MSc is an Adjunct Professor in Leadership at TIAS Business School and a senior associate at the Kets de Vries Institute.
If you are interested in learning more about this topic:
Leadership in the Next Phase of COVID-19, 2020
Don’t wait for the world to change. Find your own individual way
Don’t wait for the world to change or for some quota to propel you to the top. Find your own individual way. But what does that mean?
Published on 9 Mar, 2020
Career planning for creating gender balance at the top
Career planning is a sophisticated practice of developing talented individuals at the top by means of carefully selected job placements.
Published on 19 Feb, 2020
One key obstacle for women to be identified and selected for senior roles is "leadership cloning”
Authenticity - which comes down to leveraging difference - is the key to career success as a woman leader. But women often find themselves in a double-bind - needing to fit the prevailing leadership prototype in order to be successful while at the same time needing to stay authentic. How do you get out of this double bind? Wait for organisations to change their leadership development and come up with a truly gender-neutral system? This is likely to make you miss the boat. The solution is rather in finding a way to become successful in the existing system. This blog explains how a psychodynamic approach to leadership development can help female leaders to be authentic.
Published on 7 Feb, 2018
“Think narcissist, think female!”
"Think narcissist, think male"? A further addition to our narcissism blog series, this blog shows that women leaders, too, can be narcissistic. Yet it's a different kind of narcissism with different implications for leadership development. Three types of narcissistic women leaders - the Super Woman, the Perfectionist and the Lenient Leader - are examined.
Published on 23 Jul, 2018
"Learning to manage in the gray zone"
Published on 7 Apr, 2015
"Leadership in the age of rage"
Published on 24 Aug, 2016
"Sexual dynamics in the boardroom"
This working paper explores how people today are very much governed by the same sexual desires that drove our primitive ancestors.
Published on 13 May, 2015
"Let's talk about sex in the boardroom"
Manfred Kets de Vries explores whether sex and man’s unconscious drive for survival are keeping women locked out of the C-suite.
Published on 13 May, 2015
"Leaders need emotional intelligence to create meaning"
Published on 1 Apr, 2016